The General agreements on Tariffs and Trade || purpose of GATT || GATT || Advantage of GATT || Disadvantage Of GATT || GATT and WTO

 


The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)

The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), signed on Oct. 30, 1947, by 23 countries, was a legal agreement minimizing barriers to international trade by eliminating or reducing quotastariffs, and subsidies while preserving significant regulations. The GATT was intended to boost economic recovery after World War II through reconstructing and liberalizing global trade.

The GATT went into effect on Jan. 1, 1948. Since that beginning it has been refined, eventually leading to the creation of the World Trade Organization (WTO) on January 1, 1995, which absorbed and extended it. By this time 125 nations were signatories to its agreements, which covered about 90% of global trade.


Purpose of the GATT

The purpose of GATT was to eliminate harmful trade protectionism. That had sent global trade down 66% during the Great Depression. GATT restored economic health to the world after the devastation of the Depression and World War II.


GATT and WTO

GATT lives on as the foundation of the WTO. The 1947 agreement itself is defunct. But, its provisions were incorporated into the GATT 1994 agreement. That was designed to keep the trade agreements going while the WTO was being set up. So, the GATT 1994 is itself a component of the WTO Agreement. 


Advantage of GATT

  • GATT encouraged international trade.
  • Countries with trading agreements are less likely to go to war with one another.
  • The success of GATT inspired other international deals and organizations.
  • Trade increases communication.

 

Disadvantages of GATT

  • Domestic industries that can't compete globally will likely fail.
  • The globalization of industries exposes more of the world to risks within that industry.
  • Trade agreements could overrule domestic law, forcing governments to cede some level of control over their citizens.
Small economies and businesses may struggle to compete with large economies and businesses

Comments